image
G.J. Fernandez vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 1 February, 1990

Ram Gajadher Nishad v. State of U.P., (C.A. 1819/89) Ramana Dayaram Sherry v. The International Airport Authority of India & Ors., [1979] (3) SCR 1014, referred to. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1027 of 1990. From the Judgment and Order dated 27.10.1989 of the Karnataka High Court in Writ [//]Ram Gajadher Nishad v. State of U.P., (C.A. 1819/89) Ramana Dayaram Sherry v. The International Airport Authority of India & Ors., [1979] (3) SCR 1014, referred to. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1027 of 1990. From the Judgment and Order dated 27.10.1989 of the Karnataka High Court in Writ

Read more
image
Shivasharanappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 7 May, 2013

May 7, 2013 937/1999 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore whereby the Division Bench has overturned the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Ist Addl. .. In State of H.P. v. Mast Ram[14], it has been stated that there is no set rule that one must react in a particular way, for the natural reaction of man is[//]May 7, 2013 937/1999 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore whereby the Division Bench has overturned the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Ist Addl. .. In State of H.P. v. Mast Ram[14], it has been stated that there is no set rule that one must react in a particular way, for the natural reaction of man is

Read more
image
Shivasharanappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 7 May, 2013

May 7, 2013 937/1999 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore whereby the Division Bench has overturned the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Ist Addl. .. In State of H.P. v. Mast Ram[14], it has been stated that there is no set rule that one must react in a particular way, for the natural reaction of man is [//]May 7, 2013 937/1999 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore whereby the Division Bench has overturned the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Ist Addl. .. In State of H.P. v. Mast Ram[14], it has been stated that there is no set rule that one must react in a particular way, for the natural reaction of man is

Read more
image
Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 5 May, 2010

May 5, 2010 Supreme Court of India. Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 5 May, 2010 .. In United States v. Galbreth, 908 F. Supp 877 (D.N.M. 1995), the District Court took note of New Mexico Rule of Evidence 11707 which established standards for the admission of polygraph evidence. The said provision laid [//]May 5, 2010 Supreme Court of India. Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 5 May, 2010 .. In United States v. Galbreth, 908 F. Supp 877 (D.N.M. 1995), the District Court took note of New Mexico Rule of Evidence 11707 which established standards for the admission of polygraph evidence. The said provision laid

Read more
Pre: model railroad water mill Next: mobile li ne crusher price nigeria